but it omits the relevant detail that the hamas
us sheds most jobs in a decade replica bags The bill brazenly says that it is using "the Israel/Palestine conflict" simply "as a case study." But it omits the relevant detail that the Hamas government of Gaza has been accused of war crimes by the very same human rights groups that have accused Israel. This omission falsifies the bill's claim to address war crimes in the Israel/Palestine conflict. The bill also condemns Israel's blockade of Gaza, but omits the relevant detail that Egypt is a partner in the blockade. In other words, the bill isn't about war crimes as a global or regional issue, nor is it about war crimes in the Israel/Palestine conflict. It is only about criticizing and stigmatizing Israel, and in so doing it seeks to create a semantic association between "Israel" and "war crimes" as if the two terms were analogous or synonymous. This is, according to Frankfurt's definition, an obvious case of bullshit. The bill d...